Beating the WASPs nest - a question in revolutionary theory : IMC-SA

In a previous posting I mentioned that terrorism is caused the desperation of victims when they are confronted with a monolithic system of brutal evil oppression, and then, when they cannot think of a strategy, they try a bad idea like terrorism, not having been able to think of any other solution. The proof I offered to back up this 'revolutionary theory' of mine was the fact that it was possible to write a letter to Iraq and stop those desperation videos some elements of the Iraq resistance were sending us last year, a tactic which worked, as you might notice, not having watched to many videos for the last eight months, which is pretty obvious.

So we will conside the point to proven and the matter settled and no longer a subject for theoretical debate. You fight terrorism at the source which means that you do not 'fight a war against terrorists' and thus increase that brutal evil oppression, but rather you fight the brutal evil oppressors, thus solving that terrorism problem once and for all.

Now we know that George and his cabal of terrorists have gotten away with breaking every International War Crime on the books, as well as trashing the Constitution of the United States, after which they then ignited the Magna Carta and tossed it in flames into the nearest trash bucket. We also know that King George and his Aristocrats have also gotten away with beating the Wasp's nest with a big stick, in the hope that everyone will get stung, since it is obvious that brutal imperialist colonialism is a cause of terrorism, and then figfhting a war against terrorists as they call it, is just another way to increase that evil oppression, and maybe enrage a few more wasps so that, with any lucky, hopefully they will sting.

Well given that human beings have good hearts there hasn't been very much terrorism and this is despite the outrages committed by King George and his Aristocrats. Now when someone is seen beating a Wasp's nest and then declares war on any wasps that come out, by parading in public with a can of bug spray, we can assume that someone was looking for a few Wasps, since if you weren't looking to spray Wasps with bug spray, you wouldn't be found beating the waps nest. Now this a daring move, and when you consider that the presence of the occassional wasp string was then used as an excuse to trash the Constitution, moving the nation one step closer to fascism and Hitlerism, you can put two and two together, and understand that King George and his Aristocrats do not want to entertain everyone by spraying wasps, but what they actually want is fascism. This is a truly idiotic concept in that it is not required that one destroy the country because of a few wasps, this being particularly true when someone who is destroying the country is found beating the wasps nest during the destruction process.

Now the question in revolutionary theory then becomes as follows : how much difference is there between beating a wasps nest, in the hopes that a wasp will come out and bother everyone, and if that doesn't happen, hiring someone to dress up like a wasp and pester everyone. I am sure you can see that there is no difference, other than in the degree of daring bravado required. It takes bravado to beat a wasps nest, it takes daring to break the International War Crimes laws, and given this past history of reckless derring do, just how much more bravado would King George and his Elite Aristocrats require before they finally took the next step and gave someone a big pile of money to dress up like a wasp, since apparently, as we can tell from looking back over the last few years, beating that wasps nest, and even committing the most outrageous illegal offenses while doing so, just hasn't stirred up the wasps nest.

I bring this up because everywhere I go, without fail, all the 'revolutionaries' and all the 'progressives' are encouraging King George to become even more reckless and daring in his bravado, and take that thing of dressing up like a wasp one step further. This has been the trend all along, one retreat after another by the 'progressive revolutionaries' followed by one increase in reckless derring do after another by King George, who just isn't very scared of the revolutionaries, and I can't say that I blame him, because that is what I check for everyday, scary revolutionaries and progressives, and haven't found them yet, those people just not being scary, or perhaps they are scared themselves, and thus are being nice in the hopes of keeping their heads down and out of the line of fire, which might explain it. Or then again perhaps they are just a little clued out and need to be clued in and given a chance to bone up on their revolutionary theory, and thus I pose this question in revolutionary theory - what is the difference between beating a wasp's nest and dressing up like a wasp, other than a difference in the degree of bravado required. I follow this by the next question, which is that given the constant increase in derring do and bravado shown by King George and his cabal over the last few years, what will they get away with next?

Fortunately I have a source of fear and terrorism boiling on the stove, in the form of that scariest of all things the black American Church, not to mention that horrifying terrorist, an eight year old script kiddy who can strike terror into the bowels of even the Pentagon, with that mouse click terrorist act. The challenge facing me now is to see if it might not be possible to make revolutionaries scary for a change, instead of being not scary like they haven't been for the last few years, thus increasing and doubling the level of terrorism to a level I would find to be more acceptable, in the process creating an unstoppable force that cannot be defeated. If that cannot be done I will have to do my level best to make sure that any progressives and revolutionaries cannot do anything that will gum up the works, while that other force that has been unleashed which is unstoppable and cannot be defeated goes on to victory themselves, although I would suspect that once the revolutionaries see for themselves that a revolution is really underway they might race to catch up and jump on board, although it would be nice to see some revolutionary insight from the revolutionary for a change thus speeding up that process a little bit.

Just to get the point, why is it that all of the revolutionary or 'progressive ' people are not focusing on that shameful disgrace of Africa's famine agony, combined with that ridiculous fraud of that propaganda extravaganza to peddle a deal which was not a deal for Africa, but rather more of that same 'neo-liberalism' which then successfully tricked John and Jane Doe into believing that Africa got 50 billion, when all Africa got was a honey trap (the promise of money after 2010, so we can all do pressure politics until then) plus an accounting trick moving some of their aid into the debt column, which amounts to a deduction on their welfare cheque...

either the progressives and radicals are in trembling terror of King George the tyrant and his aristocrats or they must be the cruelest, most hard hearted bastards on the earth, and thus either way, are not progressive or revolutionary at all, which would explain the constant triumphs of King George in the past, and would also explain why he would become brave enough to get dressed up like a wasp, and then when I visit all the sites, everyone is singing the Islamic terrorist song, thus keeping their heads low, and out of the range of fire. If this outrage doesn't do it, nothing will, which explains the rise of Hitler in Germany.

But fortunately I have on board some really scary black churches, who are outraged, and some really scary eight year old terrorists who know how to operate a keyboard and a mouse, thus saving the day.